Recent News

Paul Carbon, Christopher Tinari and Dianne Wainwright Present Seminar to the Mutual Marine Insurance Company in New York on Employment and Professional Liability Issues

Defense Verdict in Quadriparalysis Case Wayne County

Delaware Pro Bono for Police, Fire, Military, EMTs

Philadelphia Defense Verdict - Tractor-Trailer vs Auto

Livingood Addresses National Construction Risk Management Conference

Pittsburgh Homeowner Prevails in Fall on Ice and Snow Matter

Dugas Obtains Summary Judgment & Prevails on Appeal in Central PA Deck Collapse

Philadelphia Partner John Livingood Presents Seminar on Post-Koken UM/UIM Practice To The Philadelphia Bar Association State Civil Litigation Section

View All News

Recent Verdicts

Defense Verdict in Breach of Contract Claim in Scranton, PA

Following a three day jury trial, attorney Mark Sheridan obtained a defense verdict in favor of his client, a heating and air contractor.  The Plaintiff had claimed that the air conditioning systems that were installed in his $2 million dollar home were inadequate as the refrigerant lines from the outdoor condensing units to the indoor air handlers were too long and were undersized..  Plaintiff further alleged that as a result of these shortcomings, his systems were not properly cooling his home and his condensers had been systematically failing.  This was a fairly complex job as there were six separate air conditioning and heating systems, servicing 15 zones.  Sheridan and his client conceded at trial that the lines were undersized and inappropriate, but they maintained the position that the Plaintiff was aware of the potential problems and was unwilling to pay for the additional costs for larger sized lines, which would have mitigated the problems.  The testimony also showed that the Plaintiff was adamant that the outdoor units be placed in one spot in the back of the house rather than being spaced around the perimeter of the property which would allow for shorter lines to the corresponding air handlers and would allow for the smaller sized lines. Plaintiff sought $198,000 in damages to replace the lines, to move the air-handlers and to replace all six of the condensers.  The jury delivered a unanimous verdict finding no breach of any contractual duty.